priscilla

You are currently browsing articles tagged priscilla.

I’ve been issued a challenge.

Last night over dinner I mentioned to my fiancé my excitement over the cast recording of American Idiot coming out in May. Yes, I am that sad. I then went on to explain exactly what American Idiot was, ie a staged version of two of Green Day’s albums.

You can imagine how exciting it is living with me.

For some reason, a wry smile appeared on her face. Knowing my disdain for jukebox musicals, she commented ‘but isn’t that a jukebox musical…’ I protested, making it clear that American Idiot was originally a concept album, and therefore this is just a staged version of a concept album, just like Chess or Jon English’s Paris… Ok, so not all concept albums deserve to be staged, but they sure aren’t jukebox musicals. Thus, a challenge was issued.

Prove that staged concept albums are better than, deserve more appreciation, and are ultimately different to jukebox musicals.

Easy.

First off, the definitions. A jukebox musical, according to Wikipedia, the source of all knowledge, “is a stage or film musical that uses previously released popular songs as its musical score.” Jukebox musicals have recently become a plague hit on Broadway and the West End, with shows such as Mamma Mia, Priscilla: Queen of the Desert and Jersey Boys taking other people’s songs, placing them within the show and raking in the money.

Wikipedia also, incorrectly, includes American Idiot on it’s list of jukebox musicals.

Jukebox musicals use previously released popular songs within the context of their plot. That is, they take a song out of it’s original context and give it new meaning within the story of their show. Sure, some could argue that shows such as Buddy, Dusty or Jersey Boys don’t fit within this classification due to the fact that the songs are being performed as part of the artists story. However, I would still argue that they are jukebox musicals, due to the fact that the songs weren’t originally intended to fit as a reference to that artist’s life. They were released as pop songs, devoid of context within a story.

Now we come to American Idiot.

American Idiot was released by Green Day in 2004 as a concept album. The songs follow a narrative based around the story of Jesus of Suburbia.

Green Day’s most recent release is another concept album called ‘21st Century Breakdown.’ The songs also follow a narrative.

American Idiot is also a musical that just premiered on Broadway. American Idiot, the musical, is an amalgamation of the American Idiot and 21st Century Breakdown storylines into one story. That is, the songs that are used within the show, with the exception of the curtain call, are all used in their original context, fitting into the storyline that they were written for.

This, to me, is the fundamental difference between a jukebox musical and a stage concept album. Why do I think the latter is better than the former? Mostly due to the fact that the songs were written and intended for a narrative. Writing for musical theatre, or cabaret for that matter, is a very different beast to writing a pop song. Concept albums flirt with the line a little, but generally fall into the musical side of the fence, due to the fact that these songs are written to progress a story. They don’t need to be altered or played with very much because that element already exists within the song. Jukebox musicals, however, usually need to alter the source material slightly to make it relevant to the story. Quite often, due to the fairly strict Verse/Chorus/Verse/Chorus format of most pop songs, when they are appropriated to the stage they seem slightly naff. A show like Priscilla works for this reason. They don’t want, or need, to provide deep emotional connection through the songs, but simply need to entertain.

Actually, I think most jukebox musicals can be summed up in that last statement.

I get quite snobbish when I get on the subject of jukebox musicals, but I seem to prefer songs within musicals when they were written specifically for the musical/story.

If you think otherwise (and you probably do) then comment.

Convince me otherwise.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Does a piece of theatre need to be good in order to be highly entertaining?

If we are talking about Priscilla, then the answer is most likely no.

I saw Priscilla when it first opened at he Lyric Theatre in Sydney in 2006. I also vowed never to go back and see it again. I was, suffice it to say, not impressed with the way they took a classic, nuanced Australian film and turned it into an OTT, high camp jukebox musical. Ok, so it kind of made sense due to pay homage to the subject matter, and it featured some of the best and biggest costumes you’re likely to see outside of the Moulin Rouge. But it isn’t a good musical…

I managed to get some tickets to Priscilla in London due to a Twitter competition (that still runs if you’re interested), that I entered in a ‘why not’ frame of mind. What I didn’t expect is to exit the theatre last night with a very large grin on my face having had a very good night at the theatre.

Come to think of it, I think the same happened in Sydney.

The problem is that I automatically judge this show in comparison to my favourite musicals. Usually, I tend to go for heavier, darker shows with amazing books and scores. Also, I compared Priscilla to the movie, which the show doesn’t attempt to recreate, rather seems to pay homage to.

So… The songs are a pastiche of awful drag standards, sometimes painfully arranged and often without any good reason to exist. The book is a slapped together montage of the funny lines from the movie, and definitely won’t be winning a pullitzer anytime soon. The cast were passable (with the exception of Oliver Thornton as Adam/Felicia who was FABULOUS), the accents horrible and the sets so glitzy they hurt your eyes.

It’s also possibly one of the most enjoyable shows you will ever see.

I don’t believe you can see this show without enjoying the ridiculous excess and camp chic. This mostly succeeds because the show knows how bad it is, and seems to then do it with more gusto. It also doesn’t hurt that it is done with tongue firmly planted in cheek. The performances are all completely overblown. Every character is an absurd caricature of their counterpart in the movie and it seems the direction given was somewhere along the lines of ‘if you can get a cheap laugh, go for it’. Some memorable examples include bouncy, sagging breasts on the bogan (Australian’s equivalent of Chavs), assless dresses, and a ‘why oh why did they spend so much money on a bad joke’ rendition of Macarthur Park (yes, someone left a cake out in the rain). However, these all make the show slightly more enjoyable as opposed to detracting from the overall quality. While the cast weren’t particularly good, I think this was more to do with the style of the show, as opposed to actual talent. I’ve seen a few of the performers in other things and they have been much, much better.

Gareth James said it best: “The closest match is Mamma Mia and that can’t be bad. Go for spectacle and laughs and you’ll certainly get them”

Oh, and Shane from Neighbours is in it. Win.

Priscilla is playing at the Palace Theatre, Shaftesbury Theatre in London.

Tags: , , ,