Review

You are currently browsing the archive for the Review category.

It would seem that for the past few months I have been horribly absent from the theatre. This is in part true due to two reasons: 1. I had a holiday in Scotland (Which, ashamedly included the Edinburgh festival for a few days, so no real excuse), and 2. I have had parental visitors from the home country for an extended visit. This means that fewer shows have been attended, and less time has existed to actually blog them. This paired with the fact that for the most part I’ve actually paid for tickets, which means the onus on blogging about it hasn’t been as great.

Funnily enough, there seems to be a decided absence of theatre from my calendar in the next month as well, with the exception of the end of October, which features Nearly Ninety at the Barbican and Blasted by Sarah Kane at Lyric Hammersmith.

So, in the spirit of my attention-deficit mind that usually relies on the 140 character limitations of Twitter, here are my reviews for the shows I’ve seen over the last few months that haven’t appeared on the blog… in 140 (or close to) characters:

Ophelia Must Die by Memory Implosion –  The Lion and Unicorn Theatre (Camden Fringe Festival)

A challenging, avant-garde piece that manages to portray four remarkable women through two young, and very talented, male actors.

Hansel und Gretel by Glyendbourne Opera – Glyndebourne Opera House

Average opera that didn’t live up to the experience that is the middle class social ritual that is Glyndebourne. Much better to watch the audience.

Spring Awakening by One Academy Productions – Pleasance Courtyard (Edinburgh Fringe)

Loved the true-to-original staging. Loved the American accents. Loved most of the talent. Didn’t love the set or the rest of the talent.

Princess Cabaret by Tumbleweed Productions – Gilded Balloon Teviot (Edinburgh Fringe)

Fairly unPC look at the Disney Princesses from an Australian troupe of ladies. Mixed talent (some great, some not so) performing an extremely enjoyable show.

Story of a Rabbit by Hoipollpoi – Barbican Centre

Hugh Hughes deserves to be far more well-known than he is. A mix between Daniel Kitson’s witty storytelling and Michel Gondry’s refusal to grow up.

Floating by Hoipolloi – Barbican Centre

Second in the Wonderful World of Hugh Hughes series. Not as great as Rabbit, but that’s really not saying much considering the brilliance of the former.

Les Miserables – Barbican Centre

My first Les Mis experience, which managed to turn me from a ‘this is not enough Sondheim and a little too much Weber’ opinion holder to a Les Mis fan.

Jason Robert Brown – Garrick Theatre

One of the greatest composers alive doing his thing on stage with some amazing musicians and a very talented lady singer. He deserved the double standing ovation he received.

Legally Blonde The Musical – Savoy Theatre

Average production of a rather good show. Sheridan Smith seemed like she was walking through the part, whereas the chorus were giving it their all. Disappointing.

Unfortunately, picking one above the rest proved impossible, and I’ve instead settled on picking two. My hero, Jason Robert Brown, who I’ve waited for about five years (since I first heard his work) to see in the flesh, and Hugh Hughes’ Story of a Rabbit, which opened my eyes to multimedia storytelling and the power of a good yarn.

And I’m spent…

The Off Cut Festival is an annual short play festival that happens at the Old Red Lion Theatre in Islington. Each year, 24 plays are chosen, with 8 being voted through by audience and panel votes and a wild card being chosen by the producers to make up the final 9. From that, a winner is chosen. What the winner actually wins, I’m not exactly sure. Possible a meat tray, but who knows.

The thing that struck me about the 9 2010 finalists was the calibre of the writing. No recognisable names were behind any of the 9 finalists, yet they each showed that there are British playwrights out there with untapped potential. Additionally, the general calibre of performance throughout the night was also something worth sitting up and paying attention to. Apart from a lone C-grade celebrity (‘Stenders, anyone?), most of the cast seem to have CVs littered with regional and touring performances, with nothing London based in sight, apart from the odd fringe production.

The Inspiration started the night. Written by Virginia Hayden, it tells the story of a woman who finds out about her husband’s adultery and has an inspired plan to share her husband with his mistress in return for the other woman to take up half the husband’s domestic upkeep. The script was possibly the weakest of the night, but wasn’t entirely horrible. The monologue for a middle aged woman felt laboured and didn’t flow like a conversation, which it should’ve. This wasn’t aided by a combination of poor directorial choices and rather flat acting. All in all, not a great way to start the night.

However, the following play, I Love Paris, was the stark opposite. The script was simple, effective and, most importantly, funny. I Love Paris tells of an unemployed Balham boy who discovers away to meet and marry Paris Hilton. The direction and acting are tight, which is aided by Mark Conway and Nicholas Agnew’s fantastic comic timing. Agnew was definitely one of the standout performers of the night, and if he isn’t seen in much larger venues soon it’s, quite frankly criminal.

Room With a Door, which tells the story of an agoraphobic man who may overcome his fears because of the volcanic ash cloud, was up next. Robert Mason as Benny did a fantastic job with a script that seemed slightly forced. However, this may have been due to the fact that the male character in the piece was much better off than the female character, Rose, played by Brigid Lohry. It felt like she had absolutely nothing to work with, with absolutely no exploration of character.

On A Day Like This followed, with the best performance of the night by Aidan McCarthy. On A Day Like This is a monologue Baz, a racist East End skin head, who undergoes a life changing experience involving Asbo Dexxie, Rupert and Coco, industrial amounts of drugs and alcohol and Victor, a soulful African with no front teeth. The writing, by John Turley, is quite good, but it’s McCarthy’s performance that takes Turley’s words and shapes them into perfection. His delivery is fast, fluid and conversational. In fact, by the end of the piece I’d forgotten that someone else had written it, and genuinely believed that this was McCarthy’s story.

Rounding off the first act is Mexcio Way, which I’m now in two minds about. While I loved the writing by Tracey Whitwell, I thought the subject matter was bland and slightly predictable. Also, while Matt Jamie as Clive was brilliant in his portrayal of a beaten down, weary husband to Olivia Caffrey’s neurotic wife, the other two, Caffrey and Don Gilet, didn’t live up to the words that were written for them. However, Jamie’s performance sold this piece enough to worm it’s way into my top three

The second act began with the Off Cut wild card, Mike Carter’s The Trunk. Slightly absurd and quite well written, I felt this play wasn’t acted as well as it should have been. it wasn’t bad, but it wasn’t good either, which seemed to be a theme for the second half. Following The Trunk was I Just Called by Tanja Mariadoss. Again, it wasn’t bad, and the concept of an awkward wedding speech from the groom’s psycho ex-lover from 5 years old is great, it becomes highly unbelievable that she’d be allowed to rant on for 15 minutes at a wedding, a sentiment that I overheard was shared by a few audience members. Kate Walsh’s performance was quite good, and Luisa Hinchcliff did what she could with the direction, but really, there wasn’t anywhere it could go.

Mitch Feral’s Sweet Engineering of the Lucid Mind was an interesting piece. Dealing with mental illness is a sure fire way of getting votes, and I wouldn’t be surprised if this one wins the festival, but I’m not entirely sure it deserves it. The problem is that the sentiment and concept is all well and good – what it’s like for a spouse to live with her 40 something husband with Alzheimers – but the play itself wasn’t that good. Simon Nicholas as the man in question did an extremely believable job of a sufferer of Alzheimers, which was so real it must have been based on observation, but the female character wasn’t altogether believable or likeable, just cold and detached.

Finally, Joseph Murray’s Rise and Shine concluded the night with a small piece of absurdist theatre that felt a little like a high school drama piece. It was funny enough, the cast, Naomi Reynolds and Harry Lobek, did a great job, the direction was spot on, but the piece as a whole felt a little forced and a touch pretentious. It felt as if Murray was trying to channel Noel Fielding and be slightly surreal and quirky, while keeping in the realms of absurdism and physical theatre, and it just seems he tried a little too hard.

Overall, the calibre of the writing, directing and performances in these nine plays is a good sign for London theatre. I would strongly urge you to head down for their last three performances this week, cast your vote and have a look at the new breed of UK theatre.

The Off Cut Festival is playing until Saturday 8th October at Old Red Lion Theatre, Islington.

There are a lot of preconceptions that can be proven wrong. For example, just because a show is being produced by Sadler’s Wells, doesn’t mean that it is strictly a dance piece. Just because the cast includes up to three dropouts from a reality tv program, doesn’t mean that they, or the show, is lacking quality. Just because a show is a two hour celebration of shoes doesn’t mean that it is, bluntly, a bit crap. These are the preconceptions that one might take into the Sadler’s Wells produced show Shoes, that stars three contestants from last series’ So You Think You Can Dance. These are the preconceptions that one will most certainly not leave Sadler’s Wells still holding.

Shoes is the brainchild of Jerry Springer: The Opera composer Richard Thomas, and award winning choreographer Stephen Mears. It is a combination of Parisian, revue style comedy, and contemporary/hip hop dance show, all about the fascination that society has with footwear. The show is performed by a small band, four singers and a host of dancers of varying dance backgrounds, from hip hop to ballet. In essence, it is a string of mostly amusing songs about different shoes or shoe designers, accompanied by a troupe of very talented dances, with dance styles encompassing contemporary, hip hop, tap, ballroom and everything in between. The material is reminiscent of Jerry Springer, without the crassness, and some of the funniest moments are in the short connecting pieces, such as ‘If you walked a mile in someone elses shoes.’

The singers in question should be a drawcard to the show in itself. Alison Jiear, who won the Olivier for her role in Jerry Springer and has since become somewhat of a cult gay icon, makes up half of the female contingent, with the Australian quirky-pop star Kate Miller-Heidke holding up the other side. While a large portion of the theatre going public will know Jiear, it’s Miller-Heidke who is the one who should be far more well known. She is a multi-platinum recording artist, who has won countless awards and plays sell out shows in rather large venues back in Australia. However, in London, where she now resides, she plays tiny venues like the Borderline in Soho between international tours with the likes of Ben Folds. She also took to the stage in Sydney’s production of Jerry Springer last year with David Wenham as Mary Jane. While not wanting to rabbit on about the ladies, it’s very clear that these two walk away with the show. Their performances are simply perfect and handle the slightly operatic styling meets comedic gold of Richard Thomas extremely well. It probably helps that both have had first hand experience with his material before, as well.

Then there’s the dancers…

It seems that even though there have been a few selections from the depths of reality tv, it is purely because of talent, and not for marquee value (quite the same as Blaze). Chloe Campbell, Mandy Montanez and Drew McOnie all shine on stage, definitely performing to the standards, and in some places exceeding those, of the other performers on stage. However, it is always hard to not focus on people you recognise when they are part of a larger dance troupe. Teneisher Bonner wowed in the show’s only throughline in story, as a hip hop dancer moving from new sneaker to new sneaker. The stylised contemporary-hip hop dance was perfectly choreographed and worked brilliantly with the rest of the show.

There is no reason that Shoes shouldn’t transfer to a very successful West End run. All the elements are there for an incredibly crowd-pleasing show. However, if you want to be one of those who can rather pompously say that you saw it before it got big, then make sure you snap up a ticket in the criminally short run at Sadler’s Wells or wait for the rumours of a national tour to come true.

Shoes is playing at Sadler’s Wells Theatre until the 11th of September

qui

Angela Unbound is playing as part of the London Fringe Festival.

This is the first of it’s problems.

Why the organisers decided to run a fringe festival in London simultaneously to not only Edinburgh’s far more popular fringe, but also to the much closer Camden Fringe Festival, I’m not entirely sure. This may explain why there were only seven people in the small basement theatre of Leicester Square Theatre, including members of the production team and three reviewers.

The other explanation could be the play itself.

Angela Unbound is a new work from William Whitehurst and tells the story of Frenchman Charles Duprey (Peter Glover) and his attempts to persuade renowned American author Daniel McBain (Jonathan Hansler) to let him translate his book, about a girlfriend (Ewa Jaworski) who happens to be with him in Paris.

Actually, story is a rather strong word to use for Angela Unbound. What is performed for 50 odd minutes is more a snapshot of a moment, allowing for very little character or exposition. It’s a shame, really, because there is some great talent in this show that almost make this an enjoyable 50 minutes, but not quite. Hansler’s American author is thoroughly unlikeable in a Billy Bob Thornton meets Johnny Depp in Fear and Loathing (or is it Jim Carrey) kind of way. Similarly, Glover as the caricatured Frenchman does an admirable job of acting a character with little depth and a profuse sweating problem. Jaworski as McBain’s muse is definitely the weakest of the three. However, I’m not entirely sure whether this is the fault of bad writing, bad direction or plain old bad acting, as she really isn’t given much to work with.

The production itself is nothing. It’s the kind of show you leave after less than an hour and after the same amount of time, you’ve practically forgotten everything. It may be harsh, but I left Leicester Square Theatre feeling absolutely nothing, which to me is sometimes worse than downright hatred.

At least that would produce some kind of passion.

Angela Unbound is playing at the Leicester Square Theatre as part of the London Fringe Festival until 29th August.

My first introduction to Edgar Allen Poe was at a relatively early age. In our house we had a weighty tome that housed the entire collection of Poe’s stories and poetry. I remember as an 8 year old asking to be read one of the stories, choosing the Pit and the Pendulum, thinking it sounded a delightful romp with clocks and ditches.

I’m fairly certain I didn’t sleep for a week.

However, my interest in Poe was sparked and I continued to read his work, first focusing on his beautiful, morose poetry and then later visiting his gruesome stories. His unique style of American Gothic had me hooked and scripted my love for all things in the style, from the films of Tim Burton to the music of the Dresden Dolls.

Add to this my unhealthy love of musical theatre, and you can understand my excitement at the prospect of Canadian troupe, Catalyst Theatre’s ‘Nevermore: The Imaginary Life and Mysterious Death of Edgar Allen Poe.’ To say that the story is Poe’s life would be lying. To say that Poe’s life informed the story would be more accurate, as they weave fiction, fact and fantasy to recreate Poe’s sad life on stage from the aspect of his twisted, macabre mind, set to a score drawing from musical theatre, vaudeville, folk and Weimar cabaret.

To say I enjoyed this show is somewhat of an understatement. In fact, it’s akin to saying that World War II was a minor argument. Everything about this show fit together like clockwork and resulted in an inspiring, wonderful, dark, witty, amazing play. I could sit here and think of another hundred or so adjectives to describe it, but that would just be time wasting.

The sets worked beautifully with the action, with a dark, Victorian chintz style scrim over a bare metal frame that featured three opening and closing doorways. Whether it be characters leaping into the darkness through an open door, monsters behind the scrim, half obscured and in shadow, or ghastly hands protruding from a doorway with the rattling, sinister sound of consumption scoring the action, the way the play interacted with the set was simply genius. I also have that I am a sucker for lighting that is almost as important as the set. The atmospheric lighting, always painting shadows over the actors, was simply beautiful and played an integral part in the horrors onstage. In fact, I think this is the first time I’ve seen horror effectively done on the stage. Notably, his mother screaming in her coffin, the return of his mother with her claw like hands and the raven will possibly make those nightmares I had as a child return.

The cast were all phenomenal, embodying the twisted figures in Poe’s life perfectly. However, the standout was Poe himself. His movement, voice and demanour suited the character so perfectly that I can’t imagine anybody else ever doing that part as well. His flawless, clean and beautiful high tenor voice sent chills up your spine in the few times he was allowed the opportunity to sing. The costumes were amazing, which you can see on countless production photos, and fit the piece perfectly. However, one of the absolute standout aspects of Nevermore was the choreography. The precise, simple movements that seem a mixture of contemporary dance, mime and buko, give every character a puppet-like quality that, as Lyn Gardner mentioned, seem to suggest that fate, not free will, is guiding these characters along.

It’s rare that you leave a theatre feeling like you’ve seen something before it gets huge. I seriously hope that this is the case for Nevermore, as it deserves to be as big a cult hit as something like Nightmare Before Christmas, that it firmly sits in the same genre as.

Hell, they even got a standing ovation out of me, the second in my life. The first was for Stephen Sondheim. Enough said.

Nevermore is playing at the Barbican Theatre until July 10. I’m hoping it comes back to London soon, as nowhere near enough people saw it.

After the agony that was Michael Clark’s Come, Been and Gone, I’ll be honest when I say I was not looking forward to Cia de Danca Deborah Colker’s Cruel. My brain concluded that it was probably a wanky Cuban dance piece from Cuba, combining a whole bunch of dance styles I have never particularly likes (latin dance just doesn’t do it for me) with contemporary dance and packaging it in a celebration of cruelty. Hip hip hooray.

If only you could write sarcasm.

I even allowed a little extra time before the show to throw down a few G&Ts to make sure I was in as cynical mood as possible. When the curtain rose on Cruel I realise I was grossly misinformed. This was not a wanky art dance piece. My brain was wrong. Thanks, brain.

Cruel is a collection of responses to difficult personal experiences from the cast and production team, focussing around a group of words. The choreographer and assistant choreographer presentedthe cast with very broad ideas, and then privately interviewed them on difficult experiences they’d had that relate to these broad concepts. The dancers then lived through these experiences again through a mixture of Latin, traditional and contemporary dance, with sometimes cathartic, sometimes disturbing results. However, the individual stories aren’t what’s important here, as the Choreographer’s Assistant states in the program, “What you see is not a soap opera, not a play. This is dancing. The stories are there so they may be understood by each viewer, in their own particular way.”

What’s important in this show is the feeling that you get sitting in the audience, watching these people contort and move in ways I wasn’t sure was possible with the human body. The passion and the feeling they convey through the entire show is phenomenal. Also, what’s core through the entire show is the quality. The dance is fluid, beautiful and full of true feeling and the dancers are all completely flawless. The choreography does an amazing job of conveying themes and stories, the sets are simple and perfect, with the table in the first act acting as a perfect piece to centre the action around, and the collection of mirrors a perfect representation of the themes present in the second act.

My relationship with modern dance seems to have improved through Cruel. Maybe it’s just that I don’t like bad modern dance.

Cruel is playing at the Barbican until July 3

This is theatre I love.

Everything Must Go is an original piece by Kristin Fredricksson that is nothing more than an homage to her father. Orginally written for both her and her father, Karl Fredricksson, to perform, Everything Must Go is a celebration of an extraordinarily complex, brilliant, funny and sometimes slightly insane man through theatre, multimedia, puppetry, dance and sound. It is, at it’s heart, a chronicle of his life and testament to the amount of love that  his daughter holds for him.

As a piece of theatre, Everything Must Go has flaws. It’s structure is a little muddled, with some sections going on for far longer than they should, and others getting the briefest of glances. There are moments where you question the narrative style chose for the segment, propped up against others where its a perfect synergy of theatrical styles. However, none of this matters much, as it feels as if this is intentional to mirror her father’s life. Some bits are only glimpses, whereas others are ran out until it’s exhausted. Also, the story itself is so heartfelt and charming that it smooths over the flaws in the piece.

Fredricksson as an actor isn’t the strongest I’ve ever seen, but nobody else could, or for that matter should, perform this piece.

It truly is a masterpiece, and no amount of adjectives on my part can do it justice. If you’re not a sentimental person, this might not be for you. However, if you are then this could just be the thing you’re looking for.

Everything Must Go is playing at the Barbican until the 26 June



I have come to admire The National for their ability to put on a show with such effort, vigour and production values, that it can be easy to ignore the fact that the play is, quite frankly, crap. These are the reservations I came with when I saw Welcome to Thebes last Wednesday night. After all, it’s a new work, based on other works, which, if Nation is anything  to go by, doesn’t bode well.

Welcome to Thebes is a modern retelling of the story of Creon. However, you wouldn’t recognize it because playwright Moira Buffini has replaced Creon with his historically mute wife, Eurydice. She has also planted in some additional characters from the Theban backstory of Oedipus and some post-glory, post-story Theseus to mix it up a bit. Take all this, mix it in a blender and throw it up in contemporary, war-torn Africa and you have Welcome to Thebes. Surprisingly, it’s done quite well. The stories mix well and make an obvious parallel to African/Middle Eastern – American relations, commenting heavily on the notions of war, class and society. Buffini handles it all quite well, with a nice mix of humour and drama, even sneaking in the odd Oedipus joke.

The actors are all commendable, doing a good job with the characters. There are a few exceptions, with some far weaker than others,  but the overall quality more than compensates. David Harewood as Theseus, Nikki Amuka-Bird as Eurydice and Jacqueline Defferary as Talthybia are standouts. However, it’s Madeline Appiah as Megaera who stole the show for me. Her intensity, mixed with her brilliant talent for comedy, culminated into one of the most enjoyable and disturbing performances in the show. One interesting casting choice, as pointed out by a fellow blogger, was Alexia Khadime as the surprisingly mute Harmonia, better known recently as the much larger role of Elphaba in Wicked. Sure enough, by the end of the night they made full use of her voice with a few hauntingly beautiful melodies driftig above the action.

The production values, as always with The National, are fantastically high. The set, a crumbling African palace complete with stormy sky, worked beautifully, and the ‘appearance’ of a helicopter was brilliantly achieved, only bettered by Mr Mackintosh in Miss Saigon.

Overall, it was a rather enjoyable evening. The script was in need of slight editing, with the finale running on past the obvious closing point and providing a little too much closure, as pointed out by my theatre partner. Hopefully, considering this was preview week, they’ll work this out and make the relevent editing before it officially opens on the 22nd. Still, Welcome to Thebes is a welcome change from the oh so boring Women Beware Women.

Welcome to Thebes is playing at the Olivier Theatre at The National Theatre until 19 August.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Come, been and gone can officially be added to the list of things I don’t get. Michael Clark is seen as a visionary in the contemporary dance world, and this celebration of his work over the past 25 years has recieved rave reviews from some respectable critics. Some of the quotes have included “shockingly good,” “A thunderous electrifying evening of attention-seeking sound, stimulating visuals, and impressive fine-tuned focused dancers,” and “‘Come, been and gone’ blew our tiny minds“ . My take is that it’s a bloated, pretentious, wanky dance piece. I should also point out that I can only justify reviewing two thirds of the production as I left at the second interval.

Frankly, I was bored.

I think this comes down to the fact that modern dance and I seem to not get along. While some people see modern pieces of art, reflecting the harsh nature of existence in a postmodern, 21st century world, I see a lady in a mirror ball body stocking flailing around on stage. Sure, I can’t pigeonhole a very large, diverse area of dance, but it’s this arts for arts sake style of modern dance that I abhor. To me it lacks feeling and connection, and seems so hell bent on making a statement that they forget that they look like a pretentious bunch of twats leaping around the stage like idiots.

Sure, the dancers were clearly all at the top of their game. Hand selected as the best from Michael Clark’s company, they perform his work with the utmost precision. However, it’s not the dancers I had a problem with, it was the dance. Also, the sound designer deserved to be shot. In Swamp, the first section of the show, it sounded as if the composer/sound designer had just learnt how to use sequencing software and threw every effect at the track to make it sound like Aphex Twin, but failing. Terribly.The treatment given to The Velvet Underground was similarly shocking, with tracks pushed to the point of distortion with no other reason apart from the fact it’s ‘edgy’.

If you’re already a fan of Michael Clark’s work then you could possibly enjoy this. However, if you’re already a fan you’ve already seen it and stopped at the first paragraph. If you’re not then the show was beautifully summed up by my company for the night:

‘flicky leg, flicky leg. Chicken wing, chicken wing. Person dressed as a disco ball.’

Come, been and gone is playing at the Barbican until 12 June

Tags: , , , , , ,

I chanced upon Daniel Kitson about 5 years ago at the Melbourne International Comedy Festival and loved his brand of self deprecating, slightly offensive humour. Since then I’ve seen his stand-up shows a number of times and he’s climbed higher and higher up my favourite comics list. So, when I heard that a few years ago he had all but stopped his stand-up, and instead had started writing and performing theatre pieces that were basically an hour and a half monologues, I was a little worried. I finally got the chance to see one of these and suffice it to say, there was nothing to worry about.

66a Church Rd is the story of Kitson’s relationship with a flat in London (Crystal Palace to be exact) over the course of about ten years. From the initial renting period, to the long, drawn out attempt to buy the place, to the sad goodbye. With this subject matter, there could be a chance that this is about as exciting as watching paint dry. However, Kitson is a master storyteller, weaving in a good amount of pathos and humour to help an already interesting story along. It’s easy for most people, and I’m guessing everyone who goes to see him live, to relate to Kitson’s stories. They are every-day stories that could happen to anyone, but his delivery and the insights he offers inside his head raises this to something that feels familiar, but completely enthralling at the same time.

The brilliance in 66a Church Rd is how the story is constructed. When Kitson is speaking, he is talking solely about his connection and his time spent in his flat, and his relationship with his landlord. That is, he reveals little about what actually happened in the flat; the relationships formed and broken, the friendships grown and cultivated, his career and life otherwise. Instead, when the lights go down between the ‘chapters’ of 66a Church Rd, we are treated to small voiceover snippets of this personal history from his time in the flat. Completely out of context, and with no point of reference, they act as a crack, which you can peer through and get a fleeting glimpse of how he actually lived in the flat.

This is also where the brilliant set comes in.

Kitson is alone on stage, surrounded by a mountain of old suitcases. This, he tells us towards the end, is a fragment of his life after 66a Church Rd. He lived out of suitcases in various countries for a year or so, but never truly left Church Rd. During the voiceovers, small rooms are lit within these suitcases, revealing achingly beautiful miniature models of various rooms and aspects of Church Rd that act as a perfect metaphor for the tiny glimpse we are getting of Kitson’s life.

My only regret was not getting enough sleep the night before seeing this. Kitson’s voice and style of storytelling lull you into a relaxed state that can easily see you nodding off after 90 minutes. This was only remedied by Kitson himself almost fainting onstage and having to be revived with emergency Jaffa Cakes from the balcony.

While you don’t get to see the razor sharp wit that won Daniel Kitson the Perrier Award in 2002, 66a Church Rd is a slightly twee but remarkably enjoyable theatrical piece of storytelling. If you get a chance, I definitely suggest catching this before he heads to Edinburgh.

66a Church Rd is playing at the New Players Theatre until the 13th ofJune.

Tags: , , , , , ,

« Older entries § Newer entries »